�m�d Jan

Kolektivizace zem�d�lstv� - Su�icko a Hora��ovicko (1949-1959)

Kolektivizace zem�d�lstv� neboli tak� socializace vesnice - proces, jeho� pojmenov�n� se stalo synonymem pro p�evratn� zm�ny v �ivot� zem�d�lc�, vesnice a pota�mo cel�ho venkova. Pro star�� generace vzpom�nka vyvol�vaj�c� rozporupln�, citov� pohnut� reakce, pro ty mlad�� ji� jen mlhav� ozv�na po��tk� budov�n� socialismu. Kolektivizaci zem�d�lstv� lze posuzovat r�zn�mi krit�rii a pohledy, p�i�em� dle jednoho z nich m��eme tuto etapu charakterizovat i jako obdob� masov� nez�konnosti. A pr�v� posledn� jmenovan� se sna�� p�edkl�dan� diplomov� pr�ce v jist�m ohledu postihnout. P�edm�tem a c�lem t�to pr�ce je p�edev��m nast�nit dopady tehdej�� kolektiviza�n� politiky na zem�d�lsk� obyvatelstvo s n�sledn� vyvolan�mi reakcemi, nebo� zpracov�n� t�to problematiky na �rovni region�ln� historiografie t�m�� chyb� nebo se vyskytuje pouze v mal� m��e. Z m�ho pohledu o t�to interakci nejl�pe vypov�daj� spisy trestn�-pr�vn� agendy su�ick�ho a hora��ovick�ho soudu z let 1949-1959, je� tak� tvo�� j�dro m� pr�ce. Toto zpracov�n� je zam��eno nejen na posti�en� obecn�ch rys� kolektivizace, s p�ihl�dnut�m k v��e zm�n�n�m region�m, ale v nezanedbateln� m��e v�nuje pozornost konkr�tn�m p��pad�m a pokou�� se tak ��ste�n� u�init z t�to pr�ce i lidskou v�pov�� o na�� ned�vn� minulosti.

 

The collectivization of agriculture - Su�icko and Hora��ovicko (1949-1959)

The collectivization of agriculture, or in other words, the process of village socialization has become a term that is synonomous for revolutionary changes to the lives of farmers, villages, and the entire countryside. For the older generation, its rememberance illicits mixed emotions; for the younger gereration, it is only a foggy resonance of the beginning of the path towards socialism.The collectivization of Agriculture can be evaluated by several criteria and points of view, whereas by refering to one of them we can characterize this era as the period of mass illegality. And it is this mass illegality that is the major concern of the diploma work. It aims to examine the impact of the collectivization policy on the rural inhabitants and the ensuing reactions as it is rarely studied by regional historiography - it is not available or is only available to a limited extent. From my point of view, this interaction is best described by the records of the criminal agenda of Su�ice and Hora��ovice court from 1949 to 1959; they also form the basis of my thesis.This thesis is focused not just on the general features of collectivization with regard to the mentioned regions, but to a considerable extent, it focuses on concrete examples. This thesis and peoples responses thus attempts, in part, to turn this work into a testimony of our recent history.